-
Categories
-
Recent Posts
- An Analysis and Discussion of The Impact of the 2013 Federal Ins. v. MBL Decision on Cumis Conflict Cases, presented by John Reaves and Les Robertson to the San Diego County Bar Association Insurance Bad Faith Section on July 14, 2015
- Major Fossil Fuel Companies See Need for Climate Action
- Climate change Threats Exist – Letter to the Editor San Diego Union Tribune
- Some Regulation Needed for Well-Being. Letter to Editor San Diego Union Tribune
- Value in Carbon Pollution Disposal Fee. OpEd by John Reaves and Ret’d RADM Len Hering
- FEELS TIME IS RIGHT FOR CARBON POLLUTION FEE (Letter to the Editor)
- Climate Debate Heats Up (Letter to the Editor)
- Pope and Climate Change (Letter to the Editor)
- Keystone, Energy Concerns (Letter to the Editor)
- Keystone XL Pipeline opposition LTE
-
Archives
- July 2015
- August 2014
- February 2014
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- December 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- October 2009
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- November 2007
- May 2007
- December 2005
- June 2002
- May 2000
Monthly Archives: April 2012
California Wins Temporary Reinstatement of Carbon Fuel Standard
Reprinted from Bloomberg News California won temporary reinstatement of its low-carbon fuel standard, which was blocked last year by a federal judge. The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco yesterday granted a request by California officials to put on hold the … Continue reading
Posted in Current News
Comments Off on California Wins Temporary Reinstatement of Carbon Fuel Standard
Court confirms tolling agreements to try to resolve CEQA disputes are permissible, despite seemingly mandatory filing deadlines.
Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. County of Marin 2012 DJDAR 5063 No. A133109 (April 20, 2012) (Cal. Ct. of Appeal, 1st App. Dist.) Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN) filed a petition for writ of mandate against the County … Continue reading
Posted in Appellate Case Summaries
Comments Off on Court confirms tolling agreements to try to resolve CEQA disputes are permissible, despite seemingly mandatory filing deadlines.
Court holds future projected conditions may be appropriately used under CEQA as baseline for long-term infrastructure projects
Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority, 204 Cal. App. 4th 1480 (2012) April 17, 2012 B232655 (2nd Dist., Div. 8) This case involves a CEQA challenge to the second phase of a light rail connection from downtown … Continue reading
Posted in Appellate Case Summaries
Comments Off on Court holds future projected conditions may be appropriately used under CEQA as baseline for long-term infrastructure projects
Extreme Weather, Climate & Preparedness
Here is another informative poll by Anthony Leiserowitz, Ph.D., Director, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/extreme-weather-climate-preparedness/April 17, 2012 Download the PDF Highlights: 82 percent of Americans report that they personally experienced … Continue reading
Posted in Current News
Comments Off on Extreme Weather, Climate & Preparedness
Court holds buyer can apply the “discovery” rule to delay the statute of limitation in a suit against his broker for concealing construction defects.
Lyon & Associates v. Henley (Cal. Court of Appeal, 3rd District) 2012 DJDAR 4655 (April 12, 2012) Lyon & Associates involved a claim by the buyer of a house against the broker acting as a dual agent for both buyer … Continue reading
Posted in Appellate Case Summaries
Comments Off on Court holds buyer can apply the “discovery” rule to delay the statute of limitation in a suit against his broker for concealing construction defects.